Save Hangar One Committee

Being a Materials Scientist and Engineer, and having worked at NASA, I understand why Hanger One is not being used. There are toxic materials inside…mainly Asbestos. All it could take is one litigious individual to get sick, and sue the US Government over these toxic materials. I understand the hanger also has building materials that contain PCBs and lead. Zeppelins and dirigibles do not need to park over there these days. Even if a long, drawn out work schedule is completed to retrofit the hanger, costs could soar above estimates to remove-hidden toxics and dispose of the contaminants due to unforeseen economic conditions like labor disputes, weather delays and disposal safety problems. What about the time involved with rising fueling higher transportation costs? I have gleaned over the beautiful night light jewelling from up top of hanger one for years, but for what purpose will the hanger space be used other than a historical landmark? Do you think folks out here would disagree that when Air force One or other important aircraft arrive at Moffett, that a nice, new, clean, and modern equipped facility will be waiting, and that more smiles will be seen on those involved? The space hanger one occupies now could be used for providing modern upgrades to the Moffett facility and create additional long-term jobs!

Now, working for what was once was FMC corporation, we remember Asbestos lawsuits costing FMC over 250 millions. Do the math. What were once FMC buildings are now park-n-rides for the Sand Jose Airport. A consorted and safe removal of Hanger One is therefore the best cost-effective solution. I have to side with NASA and the NAVY concerning the rapid deconstruction of this currently non-utilized toxic structure, clearing the way for a new structure to serve USA and the needs of today's modern aircraft.